wtf.

/lab · relationship-hacking for men

You are the system.
She is not the codebase.

Biohacking is you tuning your biology. Growth-hacking is your funnel. Relationship-hacking has to be you tuning yourselfand the system the two of you run together. She doesn’t need to be debugged — and trying turns toxic fast. But your reactions, your repair MTTR, your bid-response rate, your flooding threshold? That’s your stack. That’s tunable.

All quizzes run client-side. No data leaves your browser. No account, no tracking, no servers. Notes are pen-and-paper — we’re not building a wellness-app surveillance layer.

01 — Diagnostics

Know your own profile first.

Three short self-assessments. Three minutes each. The answers are the calibration data for the rest of the lab.

Your Attachment Style

Anxious / Avoidant / Secure / Disorganized — the operating system you brought into the relationship

12 questions, ~3 minutes. Based on the ECR-R short form (Wei et al., 2007 adaptation) and Levine & Heller's adult attachment framework. No data leaves your browser. Be honest — the value is in the result, not in passing.

  1. 01When she's distant, my first move is:

  2. 02When she wants to talk about the relationship, I:

  3. 03When I'm stressed, I want her to:

  4. 04When she expresses a need that conflicts with mine, I tend to:

  5. 05If she said 'I need more space' — my gut reaction is:

  6. 06I find it easy to:

  7. 07When she cries, I:

  8. 08About commitment and intimacy, I think:

  9. 09After a fight, I:

  10. 10My parents' marriage (or my primary caregivers' relationship) was:

  11. 11I am most uncomfortable when:

  12. 12If she got a job offer in another country tomorrow, I would:

0/12 answered · answer all to see your result

Your Four-Horseman Tendency

Which of Gottman's four conflict killers do you reach for first when stressed?

10 questions, ~2 minutes. Gottman's four-horseman framework: which one shows up most in YOUR conflict pattern? The first step to riding them back is knowing which horse you mount when stressed.

  1. 01When she points out something I did wrong, I most often:

  2. 02When I'm really angry at her, I have caught myself:

  3. 03If she said 'you don't help with the kids,' I'd:

  4. 04I have used these words/tones with her:

  5. 05My internal monologue during conflict sounds like:

  6. 06When she's crying about something, I:

  7. 07If I had to be honest about the worst version of me in conflict:

  8. 08She tells me I'm bad at:

  9. 09When she's emotionally flooded, I:

  10. 10When I imagine the moment right before a typical fight escalates:

0/10 answered · answer all to see your result

Your Flooding Profile

How fast you go offline in conflict — and what to do about it

8 questions, ~90 seconds. Diffuse Physiological Arousal (DPA) — Gottman's term for the flooded state where heart rate >100 bpm and the prefrontal cortex goes offline. Knowing your profile means you can install the right co-regulation strategy.

  1. 01In a heated conversation, I usually:

  2. 02After a fight, my recovery time is:

  3. 03I notice my heart pounding during arguments:

  4. 04When I'm flooded, my body:

  5. 05My family of origin's conflict style was:

  6. 06I can keep listening even when my partner is upset with me:

  7. 07My partner says I withdraw or shut down during conflict:

  8. 08When I take a 20-min break during conflict and come back:

0/8 answered · answer all to see your result

02 — Anti-patterns

The catalog of relationship code smells.

Named like Gang of Four. If you can label the bug, you can refactor it. If you can’t, you re-implement it over and over.

03 — Daily hacks

Micro-practices. Under 5 minutes. High leverage.

Each protocol is a daily reps move. Most have a Gottman or Tannen citation behind them. Track them in a notebook — count, don’t score.

The 6-Second Kiss

~6s

Once a day — usually on arrival home or first morning. Kiss for at least 6 seconds. Time it on your phone if needed. Eyes closed. Stop scrolling, stop thinking about your next thing, fully present.

Why: Gottman's research: <6s is a peck (mechanical, doesn't register physiologically). ≥6s triggers a measurable oxytocin release for both of you. It's the cheapest co-regulation intervention available.

📊 metric · Did it happen today? Log y/n. Aim for 6/7 days a week.

The 11pm Bid Sweep

~2m

Before bed, recall three bids for connection she made today. Anything she said to get your attention — 'look at this,' 'are you tired,' 'did you see X?' For each, did you turn toward, away, or against? Just notice. No self-flagellation.

Why: Awareness is the first 80% of the fix. Once you can spot bids in retrospect, you start spotting them in real time. Inside 2-3 weeks the in-real-time response rate goes up measurably.

📊 metric · Number of bids you can recall + the turn-toward count. Target: ≥3 recalled, ≥2 turned toward.

Leave-It-at-the-Door Decompress

~2m

Before walking in from work — sit in the car or stand outside for 90s. Three deep breaths. Acknowledge: the day is over. Whoever you were at work is staying in this vehicle. Whoever you want to be at home — that's who walks through the door.

Why: Most evening fights start in the first 10 minutes of arrival because both of you are still emotionally on the previous activity. A 90s buffer changes the slope of the first hour at home dramatically.

📊 metric · Did you do it? Tally weekly. Track perceived first-hour-at-home quality 1-5.

One Specific Appreciation

~30s

Once a day, name one specific thing she did and the SPECIFIC IMPACT. Not 'thanks for dinner' — 'thanks for handling the daycare pickup, that took a real thing off my plate.' Specificity is the active ingredient.

Why: Gottman's 5:1 ratio. Specific appreciation deposits more affect than vague gratitude. Vague compliments feel performative; specific ones feel SEEN.

📊 metric · Daily, y/n. After 14 days check if she's bringing up appreciation more often herself — it's contagious.

The 20-Min Stress Conversation

~20m

Once a day, ideally in the evening: 'tell me about your day.' Phones away. Listen for 20 minutes without offering solutions, without making it about you, without interrupting. Mirror, validate, ask follow-ups.

Why: Gottman: this single ritual predicts marital satisfaction better than almost any other variable. It's the single highest-ROI relationship intervention in the entire literature.

📊 metric · Did it happen, and was it your turn or hers? Aim for 4+ sessions a week, alternating who shares.

Phone-Down Window

~30m

30 minutes each evening where phones are physically in another room. Both of you. No exceptions for 'just checking work.' Same time every day if possible.

Why: Phone-presence reduces conversational depth measurably (Misra et al., 2014 — 'iPhone effect'). Even a face-down phone on the table degrades intimacy. Removing them from the room is structural, not willpower-based.

📊 metric · Did you hit 30 min? Track over 2 weeks. Notice the quality of conversation in that window.

Out-Loud Gratitude Naming

~1m

Once a day, say one positive thing about HER (not what she did — who she IS). 'You're really patient with the kids.' 'You have great instincts about people.' Trait-level, not action-level.

Why: Action-appreciation is good, trait-appreciation is calibration of who-you-are signal. It reduces relationship insecurity. Especially powerful for partners with anxious attachment.

📊 metric · Daily, y/n. After 30 days check if 'do you still find me ___?' questions decrease.

Repair the Tiny Thing

~30s

When you notice you've snapped, used a sharp tone, or had a micro-conflict — immediately, within 60 seconds, name it and repair. 'Sorry, that came out sharp. I'm tired, not mad at you.' Don't wait until later.

Why: Tiny ruptures, left un-repaired, accumulate. Real-time repair has near-zero cost; retrospective repair costs 10×. The half-life of an unrepaired sharp tone is hours.

📊 metric · Number of micro-repairs you did this week. Aim for ≥5 — if you have zero, you're either a saint or not noticing.

04 — Weekly experiments

7-day interventions with a measurable question.

Each has a hypothesis, a protocol, an observation step, a debrief. Pick one. Do it for 7 days. Write the debrief on Sunday. Don’t skip the writing — that’s where the insight crystallizes.

Validate-Before-Fix Week

Hypothesis: If I validate her feelings explicitly before offering ANY solution, she will share more freely and conflicts will de-escalate faster.

Setup

Pick a calm Sunday. Tell her: 'I'm trying something this week — I'm going to try to listen better before jumping to fix things. If I start solving when you wanted to vent, just say "I just need to be heard" and I'll re-set.' Make HER aware of the experiment.

Protocol

Every conversation where she shares anything emotional, before responding: (1) reflect what she felt, (2) ask if you got it right, (3) wait. Only offer solutions if she asks for them or after 3+ exchanges of validation.

Observe

Daily log (pen and paper): how often did you catch yourself solving prematurely? How did she respond? Did she share more or less than a baseline week?

Debrief

Sunday: compare. Did the conversational depth change? Was there less or more conflict? Most guys report MORE sharing and LESS conflict by Wednesday. The friction is week 1; the payoff is permanent.

One-Specific-Appreciation/Day

Hypothesis: Daily specific appreciation will measurably shift her affect within 14 days.

Setup

Commit to 14 days. One specific thing/day with explicit impact statement. Vary domains — what she did, who she is, how she handled something.

Protocol

Pre-write the appreciation on your morning commute or 5 minutes before bed. Deliver in person, eye contact, no rushed parting comment. Mark a tick in a notebook each day.

Observe

Week 2: count how often she initiates physical affection (hand, hug, kiss). Compare to your gut sense of the baseline.

Debrief

Did her affect or initiation shift? Most observers see a small-to-medium change. If you saw NOTHING, your delivery is likely the variable — record yourself on day 12 and listen back.

Phone-Blackout Hour

Hypothesis: Removing phones from the room for 1 hour/evening will increase conversational depth and intimacy.

Setup

Agree with her on a 1-hour window every evening, 7 days. Phones charge in another room. Smart-watches off-wrist. Apple Watch can stay but in Do Not Disturb.

Protocol

Just be present together. Cook, walk, sit, talk — whatever. The variable is the absence of devices, not what you do with the hour.

Observe

Did conversations go deeper than usual? Did sex (if applicable) increase? Did one of you fail to comply mid-week (this is data)?

Debrief

Most couples report 'we forgot what evenings without phones felt like.' Decide whether to make it permanent, half-time, or weekend-only.

Fair-Play: Take One Domain Fully

Hypothesis: Taking over one cognitive-load domain end-to-end (not 'helping') will reduce her mental load and increase her bandwidth for everything else.

Setup

Pick ONE domain: kids' medical, social calendar, holiday planning, grocery-and-meals, school comms. Discuss with her. Get explicit handover.

Protocol

For the full week, YOU own conception → planning → execution → noticing. She doesn't think about this domain. If she gets a notification about it, she forwards to you. You handle.

Observe

Track YOUR experience: how often did the domain require thought? Track HER experience: did she say 'I forgot about ___' or 'oh I didn't realize you'd handled ___'? That's the metric.

Debrief

Most guys report 'I had no idea how much was in this domain.' Decide: keep, expand, or hand back. The Fair Play book has a 100-card deck for this — buy it if it landed.

The No-Solution Week

Hypothesis: Removing all solution-offering from my conversations will produce more, not less, problem resolution.

Setup

Hard mode of Validate-Before-Fix. For 7 days, you commit to offering ZERO solutions in conversation unless she explicitly asks 'what should I do?'

Protocol

When the urge to solve arises, say instead: 'that sounds really hard,' 'tell me more about that,' 'what's the worst part?' Bite your tongue 30+ times this week.

Observe

Did she solve her own problems out loud? (She usually does, if you don't interrupt.) Did conflict decrease? Did you go to bed slightly more anxious about un-fixed things?

Debrief

Most guys are shocked at how often she solves her own thing while talking. The instinct to fix was substituting for the work of listening.

Install a Weekly Ritual

Hypothesis: A single recurring ritual will outperform many ad-hoc gestures in perceived relationship quality.

Setup

Pick ONE: Friday-night phone-down date in or out. Sunday-morning coffee-and-week-ahead-talk. Wednesday-evening walk. Saturday-morning kid-free coffee.

Protocol

Calendar it. Defend it like a meeting with your CEO. 4 weeks. No skipping for 'I have to work.'

Observe

By week 4: do you both look forward to it? Is it a structural feature of your week? Does it make the OTHER days easier?

Debrief

Rituals beat resolutions. Once installed, a ritual runs on rails — you stop needing willpower.

05 — Templates

Copy-paste artifacts.

Blameless postmortems for fights. A README for your relationship. A threat model. ADRs for life decisions. Real-world engineering practice, applied to the partnership.

Blameless Postmortem (for a fight)

Used after a non-trivial fight, ideally within 48 hours but after both of you are calm. Models the Google-SRE incident report. Eliminates 'whose fault' framing.

INCIDENT: [one line — what happened, when]

TIMELINE:
- [t-1h] What was the state of the system before? (your stress, her stress, what was happening that day)
- [t-0] What was the spark? (literal sentence or moment)
- [t+5min] How did it escalate?
- [t+15min] When did one or both of you flood?
- [t+30min..hours] How did it end? Repair? Withdrawal?

ROOT CAUSE: [the actual underlying cause — almost never the surface trigger. e.g. 'spark was dishes, root cause was 3 weeks of accumulated unspoken mental-load resentment']

WHAT WORKED: [moments of good behavior — a real repair attempt, a successful self-regulation, a soft response]

WHAT FAILED: [specific moves either of you made that escalated]

ACTION ITEMS (concrete, owned, dated):
1. [owner] [thing] by [when]
2. ...

BLAMELESS: this document is not used as evidence in future fights. It's a learning artifact only.

How to use: Do this together, with a notebook between you. Not in bed. Coffee or a walk. Goal is shared understanding, not assigning fault. If it starts becoming a re-fight, table it — you're not ready yet.

The README for Our Relationship

A collaboratively-maintained living document. Pin it in a shared Notion or Apple Notes. Update every quarter. Each partner writes their own sections; both can read.

# README

## Things I'm working on
[your honest list — 'being less defensive when called out', 'noticing bids', 'reducing phone use after work']

## Things that hurt me (so you know)
[your list — things that land hard for you, often legacy. 'when you compare me to your ex', 'when I'm not consulted on decisions affecting both of us', etc.]

## Things I appreciate from you
[trait-level — 'your patience with my mom', 'the way you remember names', etc.]

## Our shared values
[short list: kids first, no contempt, weekly time alone together, etc.]

## House rules
[concrete: no phones at dinner, repair within 24h, etc.]

## Open issues
[things you both know need a real conversation but haven't had it. listed openly. Aim to retire 1/month.]

How to use: Re-read together every quarter. The act of re-reading shifts both your behavior more than the content itself. Don't write it in one sitting — let it grow. If it ever feels prescriptive ('YOU should do X') instead of declarative ('I notice X about myself'), edit toward declarative.

Relationship Threat Model

One-time exercise, refreshed annually. Lists what could realistically break your relationship, then defenses you have / don't.

## Threat actors (the things that kill long-term partnerships)
1. Contempt (Gottman's #1 predictor)
2. Untreated addiction
3. Affair
4. Untreated mental illness in one partner
5. Major financial blowup
6. Loss of child / major bereavement
7. Career-driven separation (one partner working away)
8. Kid arrival (the 4-year-postpartum slump)
9. Aging parents / sandwich-generation crunch
10. Slow accumulation of contempt via mental-load resentment

## For each, score:
- Likelihood (1-5)
- Impact (1-5)
- Current defense (what you actively have)
- Defense gap (what you don't)

## Action items
Top 3 defense gaps → concrete plan to close.

## Fire drills
Which threats would you not know what to do about in the first 24h? Build a runbook now.

How to use: Do this ALONE first, then optionally share what you want with her. Some threats are too sensitive to threat-model out loud (e.g., 'what if you cheated') — that's fine, model them privately.

Decision Record (Couples ADR)

Captures the rationale behind major shared decisions: where to live, when to have kids, whose career takes priority this year, how holidays rotate. Revisit annually. Most couples never document this and re-fight the same decisions every 3 years.

DECISION: [the thing decided]
DATE: [yyyy-mm-dd]
STATUS: [active | superseded | revisit-by-yyyy-mm-dd]

CONTEXT:
[what was true at the time. What were the constraints? What were each of your needs? What was the time horizon?]

OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
1. [option A — pros / cons]
2. [option B — pros / cons]
3. [option C — pros / cons]

DECISION:
[which option, in plain language]

RATIONALE:
[why this one — the load-bearing argument]

CONSEQUENCES:
[what we expect to happen, what we accept, what we forfeit]

REVISIT TRIGGER:
[what would make us re-open this — a job offer, a kid milestone, a 2-year sunset]

How to use: The act of writing forces clarity. The revisit-trigger is the most important field — most couples re-fight decisions because they didn't write down when to reconsider. Use specifically for: housing, fertility/kid timing, career bets, big purchases, parenting philosophy. Not for what's-for-dinner.

Soft Startup Script (Gottman)

First 60 seconds of any conflict conversation. The single highest-leverage intervention in the entire Gottman canon — 96% of fights end the way they started.

1. I FEEL [emotion — not thought]
   ✓ 'I feel hurt' / 'I feel anxious' / 'I feel disrespected'
   ✗ 'I feel like you don't care' (that's a thought, not a feeling)

2. ABOUT [specific situation — not character]
   ✓ 'about what happened in the kitchen this morning'
   ✗ 'about how you always ___'

3. I NEED [specific positive request — not a negation]
   ✓ 'I need you to check with me before inviting your mom over'
   ✗ 'I need you to stop being so thoughtless'

How to use: Drill this when calm. Use it cold when it matters. The hardest part is the I-FEEL: most guys default to I-THINK. If you can't name the feeling, take 5 more minutes before starting.

06 — Cadence

The CI/CD pipeline of a healthy partnership.

Rituals beat resolutions. Once installed, a ritual runs on rails — no willpower required. Daily integration. Weekly deploy. Quarterly retro.

daily

3
  • Stress-Reducing Conversation

    20m

    20 min, phones away, one of you shares about your day, the other listens without fixing. Gottman's single highest-leverage daily ritual.

  • Bid Sweep

    2m

    Before bed, mentally recall three bids she made today. Did you turn toward?

  • One Specific Appreciation

    1m

    Name one specific thing with its specific impact. Variation: trait-level once/week.

weekly

2
  • State-of-Us Meeting

    45m

    Agenda: appreciations / what worked this week / what didn't / one decision to make / one thing to schedule. Saturday or Sunday morning. Coffee. Notebook between you.

  • Phone-Down Date

    120m

    Same time every week. Phones in another room. In or out — doesn't matter. The ritualization is the variable.

monthly

1
  • Open-Issues Retire Pass

    60m

    Review the README's 'open issues' section. Aim to retire one. Add new ones honestly.

quarterly

3
  • Love-Maps Refresh

    90m

    Gottman's Love Maps — 30 min each, you share what's changed for you this quarter, what you're into now, what stress is on your mind. Cache invalidation.

  • README Re-Read

    30m

    Read your README together. Update sections. Notice what's drifted. Renegotiate house rules if needed.

  • Threat-Model Pass

    30m

    Solo or together. What's changed in the threat landscape? Any new gaps in defenses?

07 — Debug flows

Common bugs. Step through the if/then.

Each flow starts at the symptom and walks you through the diagnostic steps. Not all branches apply to you — read what fits and skip the rest.

🐛 I keep stonewalling.

  1. 01

    if You shut down or go blank mid-conversation regularly

    then Check: is your heart rate >100 bpm in those moments? Smartwatch or pulse-check. If yes, you're flooded. Stonewalling is the symptom; flooding is the bug.

  2. 02

    if You're flooded (HR >100)

    then Pre-agree a signal with her now (while calm). 'I'm flooded, 20 min' — and you LEAVE. Don't try to reason while flooded; the prefrontal cortex is offline.

  3. 03

    if You used the signal and left

    then Use the 20 min: cold water on face, walk outside, NO ruminating. Then come back regulated and reopen.

  4. 04

    if You can't reach the signal because you're already shut down

    then Train it. Practice the script in role-play with her. Repetition installs it as a reflex.

  5. 05

    if She experiences the signal as abandonment

    then Bug in the protocol — add 'I'll be back in 20 min and we'll finish this' to the script. The promise is what makes it secure attachment, not avoidance.

🐛 I keep jumping to fix things.

  1. 01

    if You start formulating solutions while she's still talking

    then First step: just NOTICE. The fact that you're aware of it puts you 70% of the way to fixing it.

  2. 02

    if You catch yourself solving prematurely

    then Out-loud: 'wait, am I supposed to be fixing this or listening?' Most women will say 'listening.' She'll appreciate the meta-question.

  3. 03

    if You can't tell whether she wants fixing or listening

    then Default to listening for 3+ exchanges. If she wants fixing she will explicitly ask 'what should I do?' Without that, listen.

  4. 04

    if You feel anxious while NOT fixing

    then That anxiety is the bug. Sit with it. It will pass. The work is teaching your nervous system that listening IS doing something.

🐛 I missed her bid this morning and now she's quiet.

  1. 01

    if You realize within minutes

    then Repair fast. 'Hey, you said something about [X] earlier and I was on my phone — what did you want to show me?'

  2. 02

    if You realize hours later

    then Still repair. 'I think I missed when you said [X] this morning. I was distracted. Tell me about it now.' Late repair is still repair.

  3. 03

    if You don't even know what the bid was

    then 'I think I missed something this morning — what was going on?' Honest > performed-remembering.

  4. 04

    if This is the third missed bid this week

    then You're in a pattern. Install the 11pm bid sweep (daily hack). After 14 days the recall rate improves and the in-the-moment catch rate follows.

🐛 Our arguments always spiral into 'every grievance ever.'

  1. 01

    if You're in a spiraling fight right now

    then Stop. Say out loud: 'we're spiraling. Can we pick ONE thing to finish?' Force the conversation to land somewhere.

  2. 02

    if She brings up a past grievance during a current one

    then Don't dismiss it. 'You're right, we never finished that. Can we put it on the list and come back to it?' Honor it; don't relitigate it now.

  3. 03

    if You can't tell if a past grievance is 'fair to bring up' or not

    then If it's unrepaired, it's fair. The fix is to schedule the actual repair conversation, not to fight about whether it should be raised.

  4. 04

    if You keep ending up here despite trying to stay on topic

    then You have repair debt. Run a Saturday-morning postmortem on the top 3 unresolved fights. Close them deliberately. Spiraling will reduce dramatically.

🐛 She's stopped initiating affection / sex.

  1. 01

    if This is a new shift (within last 3 months)

    then Don't ask 'why aren't you initiating' (gross). Instead: 'I miss feeling pursued by you sometimes — what's going on for you lately?'

  2. 02

    if It's been gradual over years

    then Honest audit: how many bids of YOURS has she rejected in the past year (sexual or non-sexual)? Stopping initiation often follows a phase of being turned down. Stack of small rejections > one big shift.

  3. 03

    if She's stressed (work, kids, health, family)

    then Desire follows safety follows bandwidth. Reduce her cognitive load first. Initiate non-sexual affection first (Gottman's affection ladder). Don't bypass the foreplay-of-the-rest-of-life.

  4. 04

    if You suspect she's just not into it anymore

    then Therapy. Specifically a sex therapist (different from a couples therapist). The longer the gap, the harder solo work gets. This is a domain where professional help has a 10x ROI.

🐛 I answered the literal question and she sighed.

  1. 01

    if She said 'I'm fine' / 'It's nothing' / 'Do whatever'

    then You hit an off-by-one. These are pointers, not values. Dereference: 'You don't sound fine. I'm here if you want to talk, no pressure.'

  2. 02

    if She asked a question that seemed practical but felt loaded

    then Pattern: she asked about logistics ('did you call your mom?') but the question is actually about something else ('do you remember our family stuff or do I have to?'). Answer the question, then say 'is there something else on your mind about that?'

  3. 03

    if You really did answer correctly and she's still upset

    then Tell her you can see she's upset, ask gently. Don't defend 'but I DID what you asked.' That's defensiveness — fourth horseman.

Coda

None of this gets you out of the actual work.

The frameworks let you see clearer. The hacks reduce drift. The experiments give you evidence. The templates make the implicit explicit. But the work — staying present, choosing repair over being-right, showing up when you don’t feel like it — is still the work. The lab gives you instruments. You still have to live it.

And if any of this gives you the feeling that she’s the thing to optimize — close the tab and go for a walk. The map is not the territory. She is not a system. The relationship is.